integrity – Page 41 – ORGANIZING CREATIVITY

Technology as enabler — and betrayer

2014-02-06

Rant on how technology can support us -- or nag us to death with little bites.
[show the article]

Rejection is natural — and beneficial (even if it hurts)

2014-02-01

Some comments on rejection -- and why it is normal for everyone to do, and experience.
[show the article]

Making New Years Resolutions Under Realistic Conditions — and hopefully keeping them this way

2014-01-30

New years resolutions often fail -- perhaps they are made at the worst possible moment of the year. Some suggestions for better resolutions -- and mine for 2014.
[show the article]

Data Sharing in Science and Academic Attrition Rates

2014-01-19

Data archiving and sharing is an important component of ensuring scientific integrity, but storing data in-house could have unintended consequences for PhD students. They could be used and discarded even more quickly.
[show the article]

Data Sharing in Science: A Job for Journals

2014-01-18

There are companies offering to keep scientific data, and there are universities who want to have the infrastructure in-house. Realistically, only journals can ensure that data is shared. Here's why.
[show the article]

Interesting TED Talk: Ben Goldacre: Battling bad science

2014-01-16

Another TED talk recommendation. A real TED talk, you know, the good ones, this time about bad science and a few common problems.
[show the article]

Making sense of scientific news stories

2014-01-15

If you stumble upon a report of a scientific study, e.g., in the news or on a blog -- can you trust it? Here are some criteria to evaluate news studies, esp. when they contain assertions about human behavior. Based on an one-page I wrote for another blog (image left) and translated into English. Highly recommended.
[show the article]

The Responsibility of Using the Academic Title of Doctor

2014-01-13

Some people use their title on Twitter and other social media. It comes with responsibility -- here's why (and why I do not use my title online but have it in my passport).
[show the article]

It’s not that life came with a handbook

2014-01-09

A few reflections on the last year and the -- for me -- best quotation I have found so far.
[show the article]

Better Surveys

2013-12-27

A great two-pager showing common mistakes in surveys on gender equality. I can't believe people actually do such bad surveys, but yeah, they do. Worst thing: They sacrificed the chance to find out what children actually need and improve their lives in order to foster their ideology. They want to be right, no matter how many children -- boys and girls -- have to suffer for it.
[show the article]

This is a private blog showing my opinions. If you have an issue with what I write here, either don’t read it or talk to me directly. Don’t waste your time — or mine — dragging my employer into matters where they hold no authority.

The institution I work for, or rather the people officially representing it, have already distanced themselves from this blog. I find this unnecessary, as I’ve clearly stated in the «About this Blog» section that this is a personal blog.

Frankly, I have nothing but contempt for those who lack the backbone to address their concerns directly and instead resort to passive-aggressive tattling to others. Such behavior strikes me as not only cowardly, but also spineless, gutless, and wholly unprincipled. Moreover, these efforts are as pathetic as they are futile.

That said, I might listen if you present compelling arguments and evidence, as constructive feedback is always welcome. Who knows? We might even both gain something valuable from the interaction.

A comment for those seeking to use this site for personal gain: Given the increase in requests, let me be clear. I write on this blog because I want to. It’s my hobby, my playground. Sometimes people point me to interesting products/services and I write about them. But any request regarding ads or sponsored placements ends up the trash without a reply. And if you think something would be of interest, differentiate yourself from the spammers by referring to a posting — in an intelligent way. (I get enough auto-generated mails to identify them immediately.)

BTW, posts can get updated after I published them if I spot spelling errors (not a native speaker) or think a different wording might improve precision and clarity.

This blog is not focused on a single topic, or method. As long as it is relevant to improving creativity (or allowing it in the first place), it's fair game.
Some postings on this blog deal with freedom, as I think that we need freedom of thought, of speech, of association, etc. pp. to solve mankind's problems. Thus, some postings may seem a bit remote when it comes to organizing creativity. Freedom is, however, the bedrock of creativity.
The heterogeneity of the postings can make reading this blog a bit cumbersome, at least if you are only interested in one topic. You can either use the search function (above), or use the categories or the tags to narrow down the postings you see.