Release Date for Organizing Creativity II: Sunday, March, 25, 2012.

“Writing a book is an adventure: to begin with it is a toy and amusement; then it becomes a master, and than it becomes a tyrant; and the last phase is just as you are about to be reconciled to your servitude – you kill the monster and fling him to the public.”
Winston Churchill

I am currently doing the “finishing touches” on the second edition of “Organizing Creativity”. It will be available on this site on Sunday (fingers crossed! ;-) ).

All in all, I am very happy about the second edition. It took a huge chunk of time, but I think it was worth it (and I am very, very happy when the work is done).

It currently looks like this:

oc2-cover-preview

and has the following description:

Creativity, deliberately creating something that is new and useful, is more than just one idea.

Whether in art, science, or for private creative projects, a good idea needs countless other ideas. An idea for a plot needs ideas for characters, settings, and dialogues, an idea for a study needs ideas for dependent variables, instructions, materials. And even private projects need to be fleshed out.

To deal with these ideas and to actually realize the projects, creativity needs an unlikely ally — organization.

In this book, we look at creativity, organization, ways to organize creativity by mastering the topic, generating ideas, capturing ideas, collecting ideas, realizing creative projects, and archiving ideas, and at tools, general tips, and resources.

This book aims to enlarge your options when working in  science (incl. engineering and commercial projects), art, or on private projects to improve the chance of realizing creative projects. The focus is on creating the infrastructure for having ideas and realizing them.

More information on www.organizingcreativity.com

Until it is online, I have pulled the draft version and the links to the PDF of the first version. BTW, I have met my goal of staying below 400 pages (more or less, it has 400 pages) and reduced the word count (less long-windedness).

More on Sunday.

Praxis — What is it good for?

“But what … is it good for?”
Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM in 1968, commenting on the microchip

Talking to very different scientists today, I was remembered of an image I saw in my mind some time ago. That there are scientists who are content (and successful) by standing on an island of theory, counting grains of sand. They see the ocean of praxis as unforgiving, often tempestuous, full of unknown and possibly dangerous creatures, and with a deep and slick bottom. Occasionally they dip their big toe into the water, but the second something touches their foot, they retreat and bury their toe into the warm sand. If forced, they do swimming motions on the shore and theorize about praxis, but they refuse to dive into the water.

Of course, if you try to swim, you might get lost, injured, or even drown. But you can also reach interesting shores and discover new lands — strange, new places not directly connected to the one you came from.

I wonder, is this view correct? Does praxis pose challenges that help scientists to move forward? Or are there scientists who should avoid the praxis, because it distorts or obfuscates? Is it different for (sub-)disciplines? For stages in research? For stages in knowing?

Know yourself — or not?

“Know thyself” – a maxim as pernicious as it is odious. A person observing himself would arrest his own development. Any caterpillar who tried to “know himself” would never become a butterfly.
“Nouvelles Nourritures” by André Gide

Today’s xkcd by Randall Munroe is … brilliant — and perhaps for some people very hard to stomach:

xkcd comic by Randall Munroe (http://xkcd.com)

If after several trials you still don’t succeed, perhaps it’s time to seek a professional … it doesn’t have to be the great success, but at least incremental successes should be achievable.

Inspiration: Music

“I have no idea to this day what those two Italian ladies were singing about. Truth is, I don’t want to know. Some things are better left unsaid. I’d like to think they were singing about something so beautiful it can’t expressed in words, and it makes your heart ache because of it. I tell you, those voices soared higher and farther than anybody in a grey place dares to dream. It was as if some beautiful bird had flapped into our drab little cage and made these walls dissolve away, and for the briefest of moments, every last man in Shawshank felt free.”
Red, a prisoner in Shawshank, hearing “Canzonetta Sull’Aria” (The Marriage of Figaro) over the prison speakers, in “The Shawshank Redemption”

After the more technical tips in the last postings, now for something completely different. ;-) Some videos showing the beauty of music — and what professionals can do with it and YouTube. Some are rather old, but still watchable.

Lara6683: Tomb Raider Theme

Lara6683-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/lara6683

Lara6683/ViolinTay: Morrowind/Skyrim Theme

Lara6683-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/lara6683
ViolinTay-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ViolinTay

ViolinTay: Boondock Saints Theme Song Violin (The Blood of Cu Chulainn)

ViolinTay-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ViolinTay

Walk Off The Earth: Somebody That I Used to Know

Walk Off The Earth-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/walkofftheearth

Walk off the Earth + Roomie: The Edge of Glory (Lady Gaga)

Walk Off The Earth-Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/walkofftheearth

OKGo: Here It Goes Again

OKGo Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/OkGo

FunTwo: “Canon Rock”

Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/funtwoHimself

Make sure you can do your To-Dos within any given day

Well, unlooking the secrets of the brain took a lot longer than I expected.
Lewis Robinson in “Meet the Robinsons”

One important advice regarding “to do” lists is that whatever you put on it, you should be able to do it in relatively short time. About 30 minutes. Otherwise, it’s not a todo-list, it’s a reminder. There is nothing wrong with reminders, but they serve a different function.

For example, imagine a todo like “read literature about topic x” or “grade essays in course y” — that’s a reminder. It is unlikely that you can do it in a day and it will stay on your todo list at the end of the day — very discouraging.

On the other hand, suppose there’s a todo like “read Goodwin, 2006″, or “grade essay: Miller” and “grade essay: Jenkins”. That’s a todo, providing Goodwin is short enough to be read within a normal work day.

Todos, whether you keep them on paper or in OmniFocus or Things, should be something you can do. There should be a lot of movement in your todos and at the end of the day, you should have done our todos for today.

So, never put something on your todo list that you cannot do in the given day — keep a separate reminder list for that and use your todo list only for your todos.

What do you live for?

“It’s easy to find something worth dying for. Do you have anything worth living for?”
Lorien in Babylon 5: “Whatever Happened to Mr. Garibaldi?”

I’m currently working on the second edition of my “Organizing Creativity” book. It is still about half the amount of pages as the first edition, but new topics do get in. One — rather accidental — topic is related to setting priorities. If you are creative, chances are, there are different projects you can work on, and there is a lot more to do than you have time in your life. So there are a few lines on “having to many interests” (and how to deal with them) and about “Setting Priorities” (for which an idea collection is actually a great help — and very soothing). However, I also went a step further up — and that question is “What do you live for?”.

The longer I have spend in my working life, the more I notice that — at least today and in Western society — it is meaning in our life that we need, that drives us, that motivates us. A vision of something to accomplish, a personal mission to achieve (or at least contribute to) this vision, which tells you what kind of knowledge and skills you need, and how to evaluate whether you are successful in achieving it.

Or to put in a diagram (very simplified, of course, your knowledge and skills also define your vision and mission):

vision-to-outcome-small

Thing is, everyone has to find for him- or herself what their vision and mission is. And what they can contribute to it. But whereas this might be difficult, the good thing is, you can define it for yourself. It is much more difficult in the work setting, where others have to set this vision and define the organizations mission. Many organizations do not do it, or make it transparent, or make it believable (and the only way to do it is to really believe in it). And if this is missing people stay below their potential. I think this is one reason why so many people like to be creative in their leisure time, because then they can at least contribute to one vision, to make the world a little better for others.

But even then, the question remains: Your time here is limited, so, what do you live for?

Why Complete Freedom Is Not a Good Idea

“I’m free. Free of rules and reports, free of this life.”
“Free of life. Got another name for that – dead.”
Buffy, after becoming invisible, and Spike in “Buffy – The Vampire Slayer”

One thing that I always found strange is that some people wish to be completely free in what they do to be really creative. Not being forced to develop things for others, being forced to adhere to deadlines, or create remittance work.

It sounds strange, but I think that as much as we might wish complete freedom, it can actually be very bad for creativity. This might sound like betrayal if you are working in tight constraints, but consider it this way: if you had complete freedom, it would also mean that …

… no one gives you any feedback or issues any desires of things that might be interesting,

… no one cares what you do, because otherwise they would influence you, and

… you would not learn from anyone, because they would also influence you.

And without this, how can you develop yourself? So, in this regard perhaps some constraints, some deadlines, and some vested interest by others isn’t all bad.

That part apart

“Whatever happened to me in my life, happened to me as a writer of plays. I’d fall in love, or fall in lust. And at the height of my passion, I would think, ‘So this is how it feels,’ and I would tie it up in pretty words. I watched my life as if it were happening to someone else. My son died. And I was hurt, but I watched my hurt, and even relished it, a little, for now I could write a real death, a true loss. My heart was broken by my dark lady, and I wept, in my room, alone; but while I wept, somewhere inside I smiled. For I knew I could take my broken heart and place it on the stage of The Globe, and make the pit cry tears of their own.”
William Shakespeare in Neil Gaiman’s “The Sandman” (1996) (from Wikiquote)

Creative people are often chided as living “in their heads”, yet, as aptly put in the quote above. However, I think that a part of them is always apart from themselves, yet watching the world (including the one inside their heads) intensively. There is some kind of meta-process that is always running in the background, and that is pointing out interesting things. It is similar to metacognition (thinking about thinking), but also unconscious at times. This part apart watches, observes, makes notes, makes connections, and sees new things appear out of the old. It might even point out things about other people’s creative works, e.g., why a book managed to have the effect is has on you, how the author managed to build a huge story with only a few pages, what he did tell in a chapter, what he referred to, and what he only implied.

It does not seem like an ingredient for a happy life, it can spoil some situations. Personally, I find it hard to stop this background process, and only a few things like sleep, sex, (legal) drugs, or some kinds of music can stop it — for a moment. In this moment it becomes possible to live in the moment, until a part takes this observer role again. And I do not want to stop it too often, it provides a very useful perspective.

What do you think — is this something that creative people must have? All creative people, or only a selected subgroup? And are there other ways to be creative?

‘Unleashing’ Creativity

I never did anything worth doing by accident; nor did any of my inventions come by accident; they came by work.
Thomas Alva Edison

I got an interesting comment today:

pls provide tips for unleashing creativity

It has always been my position in this blog that ideas ‘just come’ when you spend time working on a topic, and that the main problem is not getting ideas but getting good ideas that you realize. Organizing Creativity is all about that and as succinctly put in this poster, I believe it is not only possible but needed to achieve great works.

But what if you do not get ideas automatically? A colleague of mine once told me that he thinks that great artists recognize when something either is interesting from an artistic point of view or has the potential to be interesting. A musician who is inspired by some sounds in his environment for a great tune or a photographer who suddenly stops because he sees a great motif would be perfect examples. These people can benefit hugely by organizing their finds. But if you do not belong to these people — what do you do then?

Frankly, good question, I have no idea. I have included creativity techniques. You find them in the HTML version of the first book, or in its PDF, and they are also in the draft version of the second book. But whereas I think that these ‘techniques’ can give you ‘an excuse’ to spend time ‘just thinking’ about a problem, I also think that they are totally useless unless you really, really know the subject.

Heinlein coined the acronym TANSTAAFL (There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch). This is also true for creativity. You can’t imagine it as a wild dog that you simply ‘unleash’ and that will do the work for you. You have to work yourself first, to get the materials to work with, and afterwards, to implement the ideas you had.

Task Management with OmniFocus

“Sure, I had tried out the Hipster PDA (verdict: too hipster), read up on the Moleskines (verdict: too much pressure to be the next Hemingway and Picasso), and even thought about Getting Things Done, but I just wasn’t up to the task.”
Bill Westerman on http://www.utilware.com/gsd3.html

omni_focus_iconI’ve already written a short entry on OmniFocus when I started to try it out end of November last year. After almost two months of experience with the program, I really like it — and what’s important, I think it helps me do my work more effectively.

Here’s a short overview of my workflow, somewhat inspired by the excellent series at asianefficiency.com:

Short work description and programs/apps used

I am a scientist. Most of my work is in the office behind a computer, so I can use the desktop version of OmniFocus. However, I also love to walk — for good reasons like health, time for ideas, fresh air to clear the head — and I spend about 60 to 90 minutes each day walking (30 to 40 minutes for each way to and from the office, some walking during the lunch break). And I love to use that time – including for task management and actually doing the task. Given that I can type while walking without walking into lampposts, I use the time to go through my day, plan the next actions, and do as many as I can (you can do a lot with mobile eMail). So I use the OmniFocus App as well — and far more frequently.

Adapting and Using the OmniFocus App

You can and should configure the App in many ways, and given that the desktop version mirrors this structure I focus on the mobile version here.

omni_focus_overview The overview of the App is reordered to have the most frequently used actions on top (easier to reach when holding the device in the right hand and typing with the right thumb).

  • Inbox — if I quickly need to capture a task without having the time to sort it into the correct project.
  • Projects — all projects (see below)
  • Flagged — you can flag action selectively. I use this feature extensively to decide which actions I want to do on that day (and only those actions I want to do on that day!). See below.
  • Forecast — beautiful view of the tasks that are due today (according to due dates, not according to flag status).
  • Contexts — Tasks have a context, usually used to describe the places or circumstances you need for the task, e.g., some tasks can only be done at home (e.g., repair the roof), others require specific people, etc. See below.
  • Map — If you have set locations to your tasks. I do not use the map frequently enough for it to be of use to me.
  • Search — like the name says.
omni_focus_rituals

Rituals (idea from asianefficiency.com) is the first project I open each day on my way to work. It has six repeating tasks that reappear each day. Going through these rituals helps me to prepare for the day.

As you can see, I review my annual goals (because otherwise I forget them), my monthly goals (work and private — monthly because this is the largest time horizon I can sustain), review my calendar for tasks that absolutely have to be done today (usually meetings or other time critical stuff), review the waiting for context (all tasks with the context currently set to “waiting” are listed there, useful to remind others of their tasks ;-) ), process the Inbox (e.g., assign projects and contexts to these tasks) and finally — and most importantly — pick the most important task for the day.

omni_focus_flagged

I flag any actions that I want to do on the given day — and only those actions I think I can actually do. Reason being I think if you have all your tasks visible you have to do, it overwhelms you and you are prone to do nothing. Thus I plan each morning after reviewing the information in “Rituals” (see above) what I can actually do on that day. If I finish early, great, if not, I plan more carefully the next day.

Of course, there are other pressing tasks that I would love to do that day but really cannot. So I have a second layer of tasks that are critical. I use a context (see blow) called “Do (soon)”. Each task that I should do soon gets this context, in comparison to the normally used context “Do” (for a task that is not so time critical). Point being, I can quickly see which tasks are also pressing, yet I only see the tasks I have to do today.

Note: I rarely use “Due” dates, because for fixed appointments I use the calendar (which fulfills a different purpose than a task manager) and which data OmniFocus also shows (see “Forecast” below). Other tasks are often time criticalbut not that critical to do on a specific day, so due dates do not make that much sense for me.

OmniFocus shows you the Task and the Project (smaller in gray) below the task. This is usually all you need. You can put in more information, including longer text notes, images and sound recordings in the task entry.

omni_focus_projects

Projects gives an overview of all the tasks, sorted and grouped into projects or project folders. They can be sequential (first task in project has to be carried out before second task, etc.), parallel, or single actions.I use two folders — private and work (see below), a sequential project called “Rituals” (based on asianefficiency.com), and three single actions projects (annual goals, private monthly goals, work monthly goals).

OmniFocus is great in giving you exactly the information you need, e.g., the amount of projects, how many are overdue or due soon, and it allows you a quick view on all remaining actions.

Note that “Annual Goals”, “Monthly Goals (work)”, and “Monthly Goals (private)” are not tasks per se that are integrated into “Work” or “Private”. They are high-level reminders. Whereas they get checked when they are completed, it is the tasks in “Private” and “Work” that I refer to in doing them. The reason for having them as single “tasks” in an extra project folder is that I have a lot of private and work projects, but not all are goals for the given month or year. That is a conscious decision where a simple review of the “Private” and “Work” folder would overwhelm me each day.

omni_focus_private

I have split the projects in two general categories — private is the first one (I’ve covered some text because — well, it is private).

There is “Single Actions” for all the miscellaneous stuff that does not warrant an own project, some projects that are important to me, and a “Private Someday/Maybe” section for all the future stuff I would like to do. I strongly recommend keeping such a list — it keeps the ‘more distant wishes’ away from the current todo’s …

omni_focus_work The equivalent for the work projects. As with the private projects, one “Single Actions” project for miscellaneous stuff that does not warrant an own project, some projects (including teaching and publications, sorry for the German-English mix here), and of course a someday maybe folder (not visible).
omni_focus_contexts I use only a few contexts, as most of the work I do couldbe done anywhere.

  • Do (soon) — For tasks that are time critical yet not fixed to a given date.
  • Do — All other tasks I simply have to do, no matter where.
  • Errands — The only location specific task, or rather, the context that specifies that it is neither the office (sorted under work projects) or (most likely) home (sorted under private projects).
  • Waiting — Important context, each task where I have to rely on/have delegated the task to someone else gets this context. It’s no longer a “Do” or “Do (soon)” context because I cannot do anything but remember the person to do this task. I check this context each day during the “Rituals” (see above).
  • Annual Goals, Monthly Goals, and Rituals have these contexts to prevent interfering with “Do” or “Do (soon)” tasks.
  • I do not useoffice“, “home“, or “people” contexts, because most of my work tasks I can do anyway, I look at my private projects usually at home (or on my way home), and I love eMail communication so there is no need for a people context because I can reach them anytime and anywhere.
omni_focus_forecast Forecast is a very interesting function that brilliantly displays a lot of information.

  • On top it shows you the overdue tasks (here: 4 in the Past, it doesn’t matter really when they were due, I missed them, that’s what counts), the tasks due today (here: none), and the tasks that are due in the next four days and in the future (here: 6 on Monday — my rituals, 1 on Wednesday, 1 on Thursday, 5 in the Future).
  • Due Today would show tasks that are due today if there were any.
  • Calendar Events access your calendar and shows the appointments of your calendar. Very useful and very interesting view — if it were a time-frame it would show small bars, giving you a good overview of the day in minimum space.

 

Working with it

I think what makes this solution work for me is that I have integrated it into my daily life. I walk to my office and have time to review and plan the day (and do those things that can be done via a quick eMail). I can use my iPhone with only one hand (using the other for the coffee I drink while walking or the umbrella if it’s raining).

What matters to me is that I have a view (flagged tasks) where I see only the tasks I have planed to do that day, preventing me to be overwhelmed (I have configured OmniFocus to show me only the flagged items as badge count, which makes sense regarding the way I use it). At the same time, I can easily see my goals for the year, or month, or all my work and private projects (and their specific sub-tasks), allowing me to see the big picture easily (at least regarding the tasks — the why is something different).

It also matters that I can add new tasks quickly, even when I am on the move. All data I enter, e.g., while walking to another office at work or while going through the city, is immediately synced with the Desktop version of OmniFocus. I do not think about backups here, OmniFocus does this for me.

Likewise I adhere to David Allen’s golden rule to do any task immediately that takes less than two minutes, and I have tweaked this rule a bit (i.e., improved my infrastructure to make more possible within two minutes).

And finally the often mentioned but rarely adhered rule: Tasks should be easily implementable. Make them concrete and think what the next step is you have to do, instead of just writing down what you want to achieve (exception: high-level goals that serve purely as reminders).

Final comments

This way of using OmniFocus is a little different than the ways proposed on asianefficiency.com. And I think that’s an important aspect: A task management system must work for you and you have to try out a few things to find a solution that works for you. Luckily, you notice the amount of work you do and whether you are happy with the solution or not. OmniFocus is — unfortunately — quite expensive, but it offers you a lot of choice how to configure it and the way the information is presented and the ease of use is … just remarkable. I can highly recommend it — try out the trial version. If it works for you, great, if not, look around until you find something that works for you — and I also recommend the link in the quote at the beginning of this posting for a completely different but for some probably more effective way to deal with tasks.