living_as_a_creative – Page 45 – ORGANIZING CREATIVITY

Chosing the right battles

2013-12-01

When it comes to discussions, don't try to convince the extremists on the other side. There are better, more relevant and actually attainable people to convince: the juicy middle.
[show the article]

There is no perfect text — ever.

2013-11-30

In writing, don't strive for perfection. It is not possible, for a simple but probably not obvious reason. Read this article if your perfectionism stops you from writing -- or submitting.
[show the article]

Building a Cathedral — The Academic Version

2013-11-28

A look at the popular metaphor on building a cathedral -- by translating it into Academia (yup, a rant).
[show the article]

How to spot a competent, honest, and upright expert

2013-11-27

Five easy criteria to identify experts, (almost) no matter the area of knowledge.
[show the article]

Biases in Research

2013-11-25

Strange how you can completely miss discrimination, but seem obvious in hindsight after you see it. Some examples, including a report on post-docs and a study on cybersexual harassment.
[show the article]

The “Yes!” have it — planning a Science@OrganizingCreativity.com Site

2013-11-25

An update on the question whether there is interest in a Website summarizing tips on scientific work.
[show the article]

Neil Gaiman’s Commencement Speech

2013-11-25

One of the best storytellers giving a commencement speech. Yeah.
[show the article]

Where does your creativity break down?

2013-11-25

Looking at the bottlenecks where your creativity breaks down and dealing with them is the best thing you can do to improve your creativity. Some suggestions.
[show the article]

Used Books

2013-11-24

Used books don't stink, even if the prior owner was a smoker and a hoarder. But you have to treat them right. Here's how. Also, a book recommendation (image left).
[show the article]

Question: Interested in a website dealing with organizing creativity specifically for science?

2013-11-23

I'm thinking on doing a website about working in science. Signal your interest by voting. Note: Voting is done -- the "yes" have it.
[show the article]

This is a private blog showing my opinions. If you have an issue with what I write here, either don’t read it or talk to me directly. Don’t waste your time — or mine — dragging my employer into matters where they hold no authority.

The institution I work for, or rather the people officially representing it, have already distanced themselves from this blog. I find this unnecessary, as I’ve clearly stated in the «About this Blog» section that this is a personal blog.

Frankly, I have nothing but contempt for those who lack the backbone to address their concerns directly and instead resort to passive-aggressive tattling to others. Such behavior strikes me as not only cowardly, but also spineless, gutless, and wholly unprincipled. Moreover, these efforts are as pathetic as they are futile.

That said, I might listen if you present compelling arguments and evidence, as constructive feedback is always welcome. Who knows? We might even both gain something valuable from the interaction.

A comment for those seeking to use this site for personal gain: Given the increase in requests, let me be clear. I write on this blog because I want to. It’s my hobby, my playground. Sometimes people point me to interesting products/services and I write about them. But any request regarding ads or sponsored placements ends up the trash without a reply. And if you think something would be of interest, differentiate yourself from the spammers by referring to a posting — in an intelligent way. (I get enough auto-generated mails to identify them immediately.)

BTW, posts can get updated after I published them if I spot spelling errors (not a native speaker) or think a different wording might improve precision and clarity.

This blog is not focused on a single topic, or method. As long as it is relevant to improving creativity (or allowing it in the first place), it's fair game.
Some postings on this blog deal with freedom, as I think that we need freedom of thought, of speech, of association, etc. pp. to solve mankind's problems. Thus, some postings may seem a bit remote when it comes to organizing creativity. Freedom is, however, the bedrock of creativity.
The heterogeneity of the postings can make reading this blog a bit cumbersome, at least if you are only interested in one topic. You can either use the search function (above), or use the categories or the tags to narrow down the postings you see.