Release Date for Organizing Creativity II: Sunday, March, 25, 2012.

“Writing a book is an adventure: to begin with it is a toy and amusement; then it becomes a master, and than it becomes a tyrant; and the last phase is just as you are about to be reconciled to your servitude – you kill the monster and fling him to the public.”
Winston Churchill

I am currently doing the “finishing touches” on the second edition of “Organizing Creativity”. It will be available on this site on Sunday (fingers crossed! ;-) ).

All in all, I am very happy about the second edition. It took a huge chunk of time, but I think it was worth it (and I am very, very happy when the work is done).

It currently looks like this:

oc2-cover-preview

and has the following description:

Creativity, deliberately creating something that is new and useful, is more than just one idea.

Whether in art, science, or for private creative projects, a good idea needs countless other ideas. An idea for a plot needs ideas for characters, settings, and dialogues, an idea for a study needs ideas for dependent variables, instructions, materials. And even private projects need to be fleshed out.

To deal with these ideas and to actually realize the projects, creativity needs an unlikely ally — organization.

In this book, we look at creativity, organization, ways to organize creativity by mastering the topic, generating ideas, capturing ideas, collecting ideas, realizing creative projects, and archiving ideas, and at tools, general tips, and resources.

This book aims to enlarge your options when working in  science (incl. engineering and commercial projects), art, or on private projects to improve the chance of realizing creative projects. The focus is on creating the infrastructure for having ideas and realizing them.

More information on www.organizingcreativity.com

Until it is online, I have pulled the draft version and the links to the PDF of the first version. BTW, I have met my goal of staying below 400 pages (more or less, it has 400 pages) and reduced the word count (less long-windedness).

More on Sunday.

Short update on the Second Version of the Organizing Creativity Book

I am currently doing the (hopefully) last revision of the second edition text of the “Organizing Creativity” book … it will hopefully be finished end of this week.

I am still waiting on the foreword of a good friend though, and it seems I missed my target of staying below 400 pages (427 so far, although the word count should be much lower). Anyway, I think it is way better than the first version and there are some big improvements to the first draft I put online a few months ago.

Hope to put the finished version online soon.

All the best

Daniel

Method Monoculture in Science

Let us suppose that an ichthyologist is exploring the life of the ocean. He casts a net into the water and brings up a fishy assortment. Surveying his catch, he proceeds in the usual manner of a scientist to systematise what it reveals. He arrives at two generalisations: (1) No sea-creature is less than two inches long. (2) All sea-creatures have gills. These are both true of his catch, and he assumes tentatively that they will remain true however often he repeats it.
Sir Arthur Eddington

I was also talking to scientists from very different disciplines today (pedagogy, computer science, philosophy, psychology, biology, …). I realized again how much I love interdisciplinary knowledge exchange despite the challenges: The stimulation, the different methods, perspectives, aims and success criteria. It shows you your own expertise (which is often invisible if you work and improve among peers) — and your strengths and weaknesses. The experiment might be the “royal road” to knowledge (in psychology!), but we are often blind that this “royal road” might not allow you to see the whole landscape. And “royalty” has its dark sides — incest, madness, and narrow-mindedness, rarely beneficial to progress.

Thus I can highly recommend interdisciplinary exchange — whether in formal interdisciplinary projects, or more informal in teaching courses or privately organized conferences (e.g., the MinD-Akademie [German, a student organized meeting under a specific topic, but open to students and scientists from all disciplines]).

Know yourself — or not?

“Know thyself” – a maxim as pernicious as it is odious. A person observing himself would arrest his own development. Any caterpillar who tried to “know himself” would never become a butterfly.
“Nouvelles Nourritures” by André Gide

Today’s xkcd by Randall Munroe is … brilliant — and perhaps for some people very hard to stomach:

xkcd comic by Randall Munroe (http://xkcd.com)

If after several trials you still don’t succeed, perhaps it’s time to seek a professional … it doesn’t have to be the great success, but at least incremental successes should be achievable.

Make sure you can do your To-Dos within any given day

Well, unlooking the secrets of the brain took a lot longer than I expected.
Lewis Robinson in “Meet the Robinsons”

One important advice regarding “to do” lists is that whatever you put on it, you should be able to do it in relatively short time. About 30 minutes. Otherwise, it’s not a todo-list, it’s a reminder. There is nothing wrong with reminders, but they serve a different function.

For example, imagine a todo like “read literature about topic x” or “grade essays in course y” — that’s a reminder. It is unlikely that you can do it in a day and it will stay on your todo list at the end of the day — very discouraging.

On the other hand, suppose there’s a todo like “read Goodwin, 2006″, or “grade essay: Miller” and “grade essay: Jenkins”. That’s a todo, providing Goodwin is short enough to be read within a normal work day.

Todos, whether you keep them on paper or in OmniFocus or Things, should be something you can do. There should be a lot of movement in your todos and at the end of the day, you should have done our todos for today.

So, never put something on your todo list that you cannot do in the given day — keep a separate reminder list for that and use your todo list only for your todos.

Tagging in DEVONthink

It isn’t the mountains ahead that wear you out, it’s the grain of sand in your shoe.
Unknown

DEVONthink has a lot of useful features, one of them is tagging. Whereas it does not support hierarchical tags (like Sente or Aperture does), it is useful nonetheless. Great for literature (to_read, read, topics, articles_for_paper_x, etc.), images (subjects, quality, etc., see Aperture for some ideas), video, and much more.

DEVONthink itself has one huge disadvantage regarding tagging — when you want to tag multiples files that already have tags, DEVONthink does not allow you to assign tags (instead you get the message “Multiple Selection” in the tag field). Might be useful for some purposes, but in many cases (especially if you tag the files later) it is very inconvenient. However, John Sidiropoulos from A Digital Workflow for Academic Research has written a great AppleScript that easily allows you to add tags to multiple files even if these files already have tags that are not the same: Add tags to many DEVONthink items at the same time.

You simply copy the script into a text file, save it, open the Scripts folder in DEVONthink (there is a Scroll Icon between “Window” and “Help”, select “Open Scripts Folder”, go into the “Scripts” folder in the Finder window, create a subdirectory (e.g., “Tagging”), copy the file there, then you only need to select “Update the Scripts Menu” in DEVONthink again.

Afterwards, you can select multiple files, go to the Scroll Icon again, select your script, and enter it. The tag will be assigned to these files.

Super-useful and a great idea by John. :-)

Update

Read the comment by Paul on how to do it within DEVONthink.

Using Excel for Biographical/Chronological Information

“Yes. It’s a strange feeling, Kha’Mak, to know suddenly that all the decisions in your life have brought you to this place. There is no longer doubt or uncertainty. The future now consists of only three probabilities. … In the moment that I strike, the Emperor and I will both die. Or he will die and I will spend my life in prison. Or I will fail and be killed. For the first time in my life, the path is clear.”
[...]
“I was ready. I had prepared myself. I had made my peace with the universe, put all my affairs in order. I had the dagger in my hand! And he has the indecency to start dying on his own. Never in my life have I seen a worse case of timing.”
G’Kar in Babylon 5: “The Coming of Shadows”

I’m not a fan of Excel, but I’ve seen an interesting presentation a while ago (sorry, lost the source) in which the author described how he wrote a biography of a famous person (I think it was Martin Luther King, Jr.) by using Excel.

He created an Excel file and used one column to write down information that happened at a specific time in the life of this person, and another column to write down the exact date. After intensive research he had a very long Excel file and the sorting function of Excel ordered all the events in the correct chain of events. I’m not sure, but I think another column was for meta information, like the importance of the event. This way it becomes very easy to make sense of chronological information.

There are limitations (doesn’t Excel cap the amount of letters in each cell?), but it sounds like a very good and easily available starting point. You can research without having to worry about the correct order, as long as you write down the exact date (2012-07-22, or 2012-07-xx if the day is unknown, etc.). And of course, you can easily copy the columns and paste them into a text file and then into an content outliner like Circus Ponies Notebook or OmniOutliner.

Of course, there are similar solutions, like using a database and using one filed for the date, or using a multiple column outliner like OmniOutliner.

So, using Excel (or any other program) in this way is a very specific solution when you get information in more or less random order but the events have a very specific date. If you work with this kind of information, using Excel this way might actually be helpful.

How to create a content outline in Circus Ponies Notebook

I prefer winter and fall, when you feel the bone structure of the landscape – the loneliness of it, the dead feeling of winter. Something waits beneath it, the whole story doesn’t show.
Andrew Wyeth

I have written about structure vs. content outlines yesterday (well, before I went to sleep). Your guidelines (e.g., for a thesis or article) give you the information of how to create your structure outline. But how do you create a content outline?

The outline needs to contain all the information you need to have available for writing, so that you can write without having to refer to other information sources (which interrupts the writing process).

1. Generate the rough structure (the Introduction — Main Part — Conclusion thing)

  • This is similar to a structure outline.

2. Put in all information you need, all the data, the graphics (preliminary versions are sufficient), etc.

  • Keep in mind that you need the bones of the text Use keywords not finished/formulated sentences, as the later “stick” together and you cannot easily rearrange the structure even when necessary (e.g., “Thus, …”, “This means …” cannot be moved without also moving the sentence before). This said, if you have a good idea for a sentence, write it down – you can decide later whether you use it (as is or for inspiration) or not.
  • One line/cell of the outliner for one piece of information.
  • Keep a hierarchical structure.
  • Elements of the same order (e.g., “Introduction”, “Results” should have the same indent depth, allowing you to fold in entire sections of the text later when writing).
  • If you put in a lot of data/complex information, write a short summary in its parent cell – this way you can fold in the details and concentrate on the overall picture.
  • The goal is to get a detailed structure and all the necessary information available.

3. Check the content

  • Is all information available?
  • Are all links/references to other parts of the text specified?
    (fold in the sections to compare information that is – usually – far apart and make explicit references, e.g., between discussion and results, or between introduction and conclusion)

4. Reorder the information to produce a red thread

  • Order the outline as a whole first (read it from top to bottom) then read/order each section again before writing it.

5. Write the sections

  • If you have a writers block while writing, you have most likely a problem with the structure, review it first (the advantage of having “only the facts” is that you have invested relatively little and can quickly change the structure).

It’s very easy to make a text out of these facts if all information is collected in one central document (the outline). When my outline for my PhD thesis was finished (took quite some time) I was able to write the dissertation thesis in 30 days.

Outliner in Scrivener vs Outliner in Circus Ponies Notebook — Structure (Scrivener) vs Content (CPN) Outlines

In all affairs it’s a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted.
Bertrand Russell

I got the following question from Carsten yesterday:

“you have mentioned Circus Ponies Notebook as an outliner. Scrivener has an integrated outliner – what are the advantages of outlining with Circus Ponies Notebook’s compared to outlining with Scrivener?”

It’s a good question, because there is a fundamental difference between Scrivener‘s outliner and an outliner like the outliner pages in Circus Ponies Notebook or of OmniOutliner.

Let’s have a look at the outliner in Scrivener first:

scrivener-outline

Scrivener Outline View (left: Binder, right: Outline View)

As you can see, each “cell” (= line) in the outliner view of Scrivener is a “file”. It shows you more information like label, status and (not shown) even part of the content, but it is — essentially — the Binder in another format. It’s a view on the structure of your document. If you double-click on a line, you open that file:

scrivener-design

After clicking on a "cell" in the Outline View of Scrivener

Now compare this with the outliner in Circus Ponies Notebook:

cpn-outline

Outline in Circus Ponies Notebook

In Circus Ponies Notebook you can use one cell for one information unit (an idea, a quote, etc.). It is much more fine-grained. Like in Scrivener, you can fold (collapse) cells so that all subcells are hidden.

cpn-data

Very useful for a hierarchical structuring of information.

Circus Ponies Notebook also allows you to add images and summarize information in the parent cells (here for example the “interest for nanotechnology” cell which contains detailed information about the four groups, complete with an image of the ANOVA and the detailed statistical values). Great for summarizing what complex analysis say and seeing only the summary during the writing process.

cpn-images-xls

Support any file type.

You can also add files, here for example and image and the Numbers document it is based on.

cpn-quellen

Each cell can be tagged with the source information of the content of that cell.

And — very important for academic writing — you can tag each cell with a keyword, which can be used to stick the source information to any quote or information you want to use in your article or thesis. In the image above for example one cell is tagged with “Hawkey, R. (2004)” and contains some information what I wanted to use from this source. The cells tagged with Borwoske (2005) contain direct quotes (italics). See Circus Ponies Notebook for Academic Writing (e.g., Thesis Writing) for more information.

Of course the cells can be shifted around, copied and pasted, and if done correctly (simple copy and paste) the tags stay attached to the cell. Very, very useful. You can also collect information in a dedicated notebook and copy and paste the cells in a new notebook, in which you put what you need for writing the article. And given that you can add a checkbox to each cell you can always stop and resume writing and know where you stopped. I strongly recommend using meta information, for example what should be in a section or what should be clear after reading a section, in the outline. If you look at the first Circus Ponies Notebook image in this posting, you see orange text as a child cell under the Method section parent cell (“show what was done …”) and likewise as a child cell under the Design parent cell (“begins with an overview …”). Sometimes it is hard to remember during writing what a section is supposed to accomplish and this meta information (in another color and with checkboxes) is a tremendous help.

So, in Scrivener one outline “cell” is actually a text file — it is a structure outline. Very good to get an overview of the document, see which “sections” need work (e.g., status as First Draft, Word Count). But even if you display the content of this cell in the outline view, a single “cell” (= line) usually contains more than one idea, which makes it very hard to change the structure as sentences tend to stick together. Thus, it is very useful for higher order structuring like part, chapter, subchapter, even on a paragraph level. But you probably wouldn’t want to use it on an argument/idea/information unit level. Personally I went so far to use separate files for subsections, but not for paragraphs, i.e., one subsection (like the “Design” section below) contains multiple paragraphs and ideas.

scrivener-design

A "cell" = text file in Scrivener contains more than one idea ... here, multiple paragraphs.

In Circus Ponies Notebook one cell contains one unit of information/one idea/argument. If I have taken it from another source, the source information is tagged to that cell (assigned as keyword, which can be views with cmd + k). This kind of content outline is made to have its cells reordered, folded in, shifted around. I change and simplify the structure during the planing phase when I put information in this content outline by summarizing subcells in their parent cells (e.g., multiple sources say the same, the parent cell thus contains a summary). When writing I can use the summary or go into the details, depending on how much space I have during writing.

reducing-extraneous-load

Circus Ponies Notebook (left) next to Scrivener (right) -- a very good combination.

In practice, both types of outlines combine perfectly, and although in almost every case, a content outline is also a structure outline, it is helpful to use Scrivener and the Structure Outline for writing. I start with Circus Ponies Notebook to create the content outline, make sure I have all information available in it and the structure works (thread/story). Then I fire up Scrivener, use the Binder to create a structure outline (on a higher level, see image), put the Circus Ponies Notebook content outline next to the Scrivener file and start writing.

Circus Ponies Notebook excels when it comes to keeping the content available, giving me the source information (keywords), allowing me to fold in information that I do not need (e.g., level of detail is too high), and having cells with checkboxes, which allows me to easily stop and resume my work.

Scrivener excels in writing, especially making Snapshots of prior versions, giving me word counts, and quickly jumping between places in the document (via the Binder of Scrivener which only contains the higher level structure and the text files).

Docear — Literature Management and Writing with Mind Maps

Words – so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them.
Nathaniel Hawthorne

Kurt wrote me a comment about docear, a software that integrates a PDF reader (with annotations) with a Mind Mapping tool. And the software really integrates them, like reading the annotations/highlights and making them available in the Mind Map. The following video gives a good introduction:

Whereas annotations and comments in PDFs are nothing special, I really love the way the highlighted sections and comments can be automatically extracted from the PDFs. This is something where many literature management tools are lacking: I can annotate or highlight in my PDFs, but I want more … I want the text available outside of the document. And looking from the video, docear can give you this. Likewise, using Mind Maps for writing is an interesting idea (cf. this posting about writing articles with Mind Maps).

However, I am not so sure whether the approach be docear does scale to literature management. A Mind Map is a hierarchical structure, and in many cases, one might want to put one paper in different sections or categories. One reason why I use DEVONthink and tags for my literature. Likewise I want to be flexible in the way I work and use Circus Ponies and Scrivener for writing. Also, I am unsure whether I would trust my literature to one software, also I expect that the PDFs are annotated in the files itself and can be exported — and thereby still be used without the program.

But it looks like an interesting idea if this is the way you want to work. If Mind Maps are your way to work, why not use a program that combines your literature management software and your Mind Map for writing in one package? However, what I can say about the software is limited, as I do not have the time for an in-depth testing at the moment. If I had, I’d make sure that my PDFs can be exported (with annotations/highlights) and use a naming scheme like author_year.pdf or author_author_…_year.pdf to make sure I can leave the software if I need to, then give it a try.

So, what are your experiences with it? Would you try docear?